Quantum Pranx


The Annunaki and Us

leave a comment »

The solution to the Darwinian-Creationist divide?
Or, the more we know, the more we know we don’t know?

With thanks and apologies to Neil Freer, who nearly became one of my favourite commentators on the Annunaki, but whose overarching intellectual style and verbosity were too ego-driven for comfort. Those long and sloppy, winding, self-admiring sentences! Almost constipated! So I have taken the liberty of deleting and re-writing whole sections. Why make life difficult for the reader, the searcher of truth? But it is only his style I take exception to, not the content. This is a story that cannot be ignored. He is also a ferocious supporter (some might say the only supporter) of Zacharia Sitchin, whose central theme is so staggering, so unbelievable, as to pull us, kicking and screaming, right out of our cosy little comfort zone into another reality altogether. (I rather like the line “the more we know, the more we know we don’t know”  that Freer wrote, I should use it at the top of every contentious piece in this blog). 

But I also want to emphasise that I do not blindly accept every detail of this extraterrestrial solution to the great mystery of human origins, but I am very much fascinated by it. How could anybody not be? However, I am bothered by the lack of spiritual underpinning and esoteric essence, but that’s just me. I’ll go further: Freer irritates me no end with his rude statements (see towards the end of this piece, where he says: “But, as our own evolutionary agents, free of both Western and Eastern karmadharmadiddle,…” So there is a good deal of materialistic reductionism in the whole argument, and truth is, as always, a very hard thing to pin down. So strap yourself in, because a lot of people will not and do not like this story one little bit…


A Synopsis of the Sitchin Paradigm 

WORKING FROM THE same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for two hundred years, Sitchin propounds – proves, in the opinion of this author, that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: “those who came down from the heavens”; Old Testament Hebrew, Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years ago, colonized the planet, with the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold.

Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions in the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and Ninhursag their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory results splicing animal and Homo Erectus genes, merged their Anunnaki genes with that of Homo Erectus and produced us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species, for their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid, we could not procreate. The demand for us as workers became greater and we were genetically manipulated to reproduce. 

Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet. Having become a stable genetic stock and developing more precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This was unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council and it was decided to wipe out the human population through a flood that was predictable when Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet, came through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its periodic 3600 year returns. Some humans were saved by the action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to the humans he had originally genetically created.

For thousands of years, we were their slaves, their workers, their servants, and their soldiers in their political battles among themselves. The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their palaces (we retroproject the religious notion of temple on these now), their cities, their mining and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on all the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found in the farthest reaches of the planet. 

Around 6000 years ago, they, probably realizing that they were going to phase off the planet, began, gradually, to bring humans to independence. Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its “sudden”, mature, and highly advanced character was set up under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of the human populations answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” was initiated (Gardner). These designated humans were taught technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts and the ways of advanced civilized society (in schools, called now “mystery schools” but there was no mystery about them).

Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer gun-shy of the Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one branded “heretical” and murderously persecuted by the Roman Church. There were no Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep in the dark about the real nature of human history and destroy the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops. 


Part 1 
The Status Quo: Totem and Taboos and You… and I 

Our planet, this agonizingly beautiful little planet, is on hold. Seeking relief and release, in a perverse ecology we recycle outmoded, primitive paradigms. We are not able to resolve the separations caused by our many overlapping intra-species realities. It has rendered us theologically inane, philosophically naive, scientifically cramped, socially isolated, ecologically damaged, politically challenged and intellectually bewildered. 

It is clearly evident, after thousands of years of trial and disastrous errors, that the relief and release that we seek as individuals and as a planetary species will not come from yet another economic experiment, yet another U.N. negotiated conflict resolution, yet another religious ecumenical conference, or yet another political format or new age vision, or some war to end all wars. 

The purpose of this paper is to point out an overarching new paradigm that redefines and thereby resolves and supercedes the most fundamental cause of the divisions and conflicts between us and illuminates the now and future trajectory of the new planetary human. 

Is it even possible to arrive at an overarching new planetary paradigm so comprehensive and robust that it corrects, subsumes, completes and outmodes all previous partial paradigms, explains all our previous explanations, with the scope and power to unify and pacify the planet?  Unequivocally, yes. We are blocked only by primitive, antique legacies. 

How adolescent a species are we? We are accustomed to analyze, evaluate and react to significant positive or negative events in the public and private sectors in terms of political, military, economic, scientific, psychological, sociological, or religious factors and ramifications. We do this in the context of a primitive economic, competitive mammalian politics based on territory and the protection of limited survival resources when national boundaries have been rendered meaningless and free energy sources are already available. The least evolved among us, in a perversion of the word “conservative ”, preserve their wealth, built on limited energy supply, by deliberately suppressing developments that would make it limitless. We get the “rise” of the European Union, in its turn in the dreary cycles of competitive mammalian economics. Then the “rise” of China, and so on. 

Politically, we have created governments peopled largely by the cynically devolved, many sincere, perhaps, but myopic, in a time when sincerity alone is tragically inadequate. We are still working through systems of representation by strangers when direct, instantaneous input from the entire population is quite possible. Representation, due to antiquated polling and analytical methods, therefore produces mediocre politicians from the middle of the demographic bell curve where the most votes lie.

Ideologically, philosophically, the four criterion bases which we generally use to determine the truth or falsity, beneficence or harmfulness, morality or immorality of information, theology, philosophy, science and “new age” values, rattle around in a criteria vacuum with little overlap and major conflicts because each tends to define a human being and the meaning of human existence in a quite different way. Among some humans, there is a slinking cynicism, an often unspoken, viral attitude in human society that holds the view that it is impossible to get out of the criteria vacuum, to initiate a common ground and impossible to get past the communicatory barriers of turf and custom, belief and taboo. When talking about the human we are largely ineffectual because we are Babel-factored, literally talking at each other about a different entity. 

Technologically, we are eager and close to being able to create artificial intelligence and consciousness, when we cannot agree on the nature of our own consciousness!

How primitively adolescent are we? Most fundamentally and amazingly, we do not have a consensual, planetary, generic definition of what a human being is. We disagree about how we really came into existence, and what the nature of our developmental process is. We have treated the sociobiological event of the beginning of our species as if we could never be sure if it ever really occurred. We have not resolved nor integrated our genesis and our history as a species and, therefore, not understood our real nature and future trajectory. 

These problems translate to the problems that are related to our children and their education. Currently, we matriculate our young, (these amazing, parallel processing, relativistic, quantum jumping, multi-dimensional consciousnesses) into naïve semi-illiteracy for fear of them questioning our shambling senilities. In a time when we need to stretch our historical sense to allow for the visitation of our planet by alien species from before our origins, we teach them drum and trumpet mammalian history fleshed out with desiccated, parochial, political platitudes. We teach our children generally the same platitudes and clichés we were taught and brand them with the same religious, scientific, and intellectual taboos we were tattooed with as children and expect that they will somehow be ready to do better than we. We do not teach our minors any philosophical structures although they are capable of calculus. We do not allow a teacher in the public school system to teach our children anything important because we do not agree about what to teach them, because we do not agree about who and what we are. We do not educate our children in the refinement and evolution of their personal spectrums of consciousness because we do not agree on what that spectrum includes. And the children are literally our future, they are us in the future. 

The current status quo is revealed, therefore, at its most fundamental strata, to be, obviously, simply a continuation of the primitive theo-political conflicts that we have known for the past three thousand years. The major obstacles that are most fundamentally influencing and hindering our planetary understanding and progress are cultural legacies, cultural lock-ins that are with us as the deepest dyes in the tapestries of our cultures, locked in legacies that influence our thinking, our science, our logic, and our concepts of ourselves. We are too close to them, or think that they do not influence us, or that they have been dealt with in the scientific or academic world long ago, or that we can just ignore them. We deal, furthermore, with all these problems in a Paleolithic, turfish manner from the isolated towers of Cartesian-Newtonian oligarchies. 

It has been said that the world’s most complex mechanism comes without an owner’s manual. We have many different and conflicting definitions of what a human is and a number of conflicting “owner’s manuals” by which a human is supposed to operate. The word “owner” is the key: there are two major “owner’s manuals” in the form of Bible and Koran and two in the form of The Book of Changes (The I Ching) and the Book of the Tao. These are instruction manuals in which the “owner” is understood as the human consulting them. In the case of the Bible and the Koran the “owners” are not the humans but the deities associated with the manuals. This relationship of “owner” to subject, deity to servant or slave, is understood by the vast majority as “religion”.  We hardly question this concept. Those who do question it have often been killed by those who do not. Those of one slave-code religion have often killed those of another slave-code religion over whose owner is the only real Owner or which code is the correct one. Ultimately, these slave-code definitions determine our cultures and their legacies and traditions and are the most basic cause of the separations, divisions, conflicts and wars between humans. 

A Self-Indictment 

Part 1, obviously, constitutes a very broad, serious and daunting self-indictment. I posit a caveat: When I name names and institutions, critically or otherwise, I intend them as part of us, as a self-indictment: it is simply we doing these things to ourselves. Let us be easy on ourselves, however, since we are the only game like us on the planet, the only example we can work with, the inadequate conceptual boxes we inhabit are of our making but also ours out of which to break. If these negatives were all there were, then the fears of those in future shock would be vindicated. If I had no suggestions, solutions, answers or resolutions to offer I would not have written this paper. So the second half of this paper respectfully offers an overview and paradigm that can take us, in the perspective of a deepened knowledge of our species and ourselves, to a new level of racial maturity and a degree of freedom previously unavailable. The new synthesis subsumes partial glimpses of a new politic, humanistic new world order, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or Western mysticism, a third culture, spiritualized psychology, all knowledge united in a grand consilience, or cerebral turning points. We now have the keys to integrate our past with our present and future in the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor for achieving planetary unity. 

Part 2 
The Primary Key to Unlocking the Locked-in Legacies 

“What is emerging now is a sense that something else – neither mechanistic (Darwin) nor theistic (the Bible) – is going on. But mainstream science will have none of this ambiguity, and reactively tars all non-Darwinian notions with the broad brush of “biblical superstition”. The net result has become a sort of silly high drama in which one flavor of pseudoscience attempts to do battle with another”. 
John Anthony West 

While the evolutionists and the creationists have been battling it out through dramatic episodes of the Scopes soaps, another explanatory paradigm has been developing exponentially which subsumes, corrects, and makes obsolete, specifically relative to the human species , both of those rather primitive paradigms. While the scientific imperialists and the religious dogmatists have thought that they owned the discussion by proprietarily boxing the argument and defining the binary options, the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin, has advanced a robust and coherent, alternative paradigm of our genesis and unique history that, if true, and I am convinced that it is after working critically with it for 28 years is profound, comprehensive, and robust enough to enable us to rewrite the entire history of our beginnings and the planet astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically, archaeologically and, literally, redefine ourselves as humans.

Sitchin’s thesis illuminates that antique conflict with Nobel prize quality research, renders the, by now, Monty Pythonesque arguments outmoded, subsumes and corrects creationism, redefines Darwinism as well as its latter day detractions. He has been able to do this because he reads Sumerian as well as the Semitic languages including ancient and Modern Hebrew, and is steeped in the history. He has had the advantage of access to the accumulated scholarship and archaeological material from the Middle East rediscovered only in the last one hundred and fifty years. 

Our Genesis Revisited: The Sitchin Paradigm 

For a more complete and detailed  synopsis of the Sitchin thesis, the context and historical background needed to understand it, the proofs of its validity and scientific objections regarding it answered, see Appendix A 

Zecharia Sitchin, one of two hundred Sumerian scholars on the planet who can read a cuneiform clay tablet like you and I can read a newspaper, has demonstrated [1] that the Anunnaki/Nefilim (Sumerian/Hebrew: those who came down [from the heavens] ), the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient civilizations from the tenth planet in our solar system, Nibiru, colonized Earth 432,000 years ago and created the human species 200,000 years ago, by genetically crossing their genes with Homo Erectus. Corroboration comes from evidence for Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory [2], the Infrared search by the IRAS satellite in ‘83-’84 ;genetically from the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve”; anthropologically from the “out of Africa” data placing our genesis in Central Africa 200,000 years; enigmatic ooparts and close to two million pieces of artifact and documentation recovered directly from the ancient civilizations.

Our modern science has provided a means of identifying advanced science in the ancient past previously thought of as fantastic even for us. The advances in our scientific discoveries in genetics, mitochondrial DNA research, space and planetary science, archaeology, paleontology, anthropology, and linguistics as well as even the physics of metallurgy have enabled Sitchin to demystify the advanced technologies of the Anunnaki and identify and explain ooparts [3]. We have progressed from being their slave animals to limited partnership and, since they phased off Earth, are now phasing out of a 3,000 year traumatic transition to racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component. 

Central to the history of the Anunnaki’s occupation of the planet was the interaction between two brothers, Enlil and Enki. Enki was their chief scientist who was responsible, with his sister Ninhursag, their chief medical officer, for the genetic creation of our species. Enki, obviously, was sympathetic towards humans and promoted our interests and us. Enlil, eventually known as Jehovah/YHWH, of the Old Testament, maintained the position that humans were to remain slaves, totally subservient to the Anunnaki and him especially. 

The Traumatic Transition 

The Anunnaki phased off this planet around 1250 B.C. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we humans have been going through a very traumatic transition to racial independence. Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who knew and knows what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or when they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals learned under the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and strife broke out between them. Religious ritual is the transmutation of palace servant duties. The serving of favorite roasted meats on the Anunnaki table became the offering of “burnt offerings” on the table now become an “altar”, the transportation of the Anunnaki local ruler on a dais became a procession of statues, the Anunnaki palaces became “temples”, etc.

The Anunnaki were, clearly and unambiguously, known to the humans who were in contact with them as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids (taller and huskier than we, male and female, the males bearded. We look like they look because we are half Anunnaki). It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized. Breaking the godspell has seen us go through the stages of abandonment to dissociation, transmutation, religion, rebellion and now to recovery. We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where they went for some three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions. We are ready to step out of racial adolescence. [4] 

Ramifications and Resolutions 

The “occult” is time-release packages of advanced technological information entrusted to us in “crash courses” in civilization, often lost through time, now being recovered through the clues and recognition afforded by our own science. Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, “out of place” in time are remnants of lost technology and knowledge. Transcendental experience is redefined in terms of dimensional expansion of consciousness and perception. We are rapidly evolving to habitual four-dimensional consciousness. Transcendence is conscious metamorphic dimensional exploration, participatory expansion at the leading edge of our special-case evolution. The totems and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can get off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap and complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic enlightenment. 

Mythology is our greatest myth. We can move beyond the interpretation of the gods as myth, Jungian archetypes, [5] and schizophrenic hallucinations. History as hallucination and “mythinformation”, after two hundred years of explanatory failure, although still hiding behind tenure in the university, is a dead issue. 

Why is the Sitchin paradigm so pivotal? It is the meta-paradigm that affords the potential to remove the resultant, stultifying, locked-in legacies that have kept up separate and enervated for millennia. The new paradigm is so encompassing and penetrating that it is a unique meta-wild card: it redefines every cardinal element of human existence that we think we have understood including a redefinition of our evolution, all our cultures, our religions and of our very selves. 

Those who talk of a singularity, a shearing drop to extreme novelty and fundamental revolutionary change at some near point in our future that is so profound that it will change human nature do not have to look any further than the Sitchin paradigm. It is there for the acceptance and it will rewrite the entirety of our history and redefine human nature. After a century and a half of examination and attempted explanation and suppression of the historical, archaeological, anthropological and astronomical evidence accumulated, no other explanatory paradigm comes close to the totally coherent, robust and logical Sitchin thesis. Can and will it be improved or corrected? Certainly. 

Just within the time of the writing of this paper there has been a report of the discovery, by satellite scan, of a city, two miles by fives miles in area, under thirty feet of water in the ocean twenty five miles off the northwest coast of India. Preliminary carbon dating of dredged materials from the site indicate its age as nine thousand years old, placing it earlier than Sumer. The histories of India (declared myth by the British because they were older than the Empire) speak in detail about civilizations and humans in the very remote past and mention this city by name. 

What appears to be a city has been reported off the coast of Cuba under an astounding 2,100 feet of water, discovered by professional treasure wreck hunters using sophisticated equipment. 

The Takenouchi documents and artifacts, ancient treasure of the Japanese Emperor guarded for 2,500 years by the family of the highest Shinto priest caste family, speak of an alien civilization coming here from space and founding the human race. 

All these facts and histories need to be studied thoroughly and integrated with the histories and data from the entire planet. We have much work to do. The planetary benefits will be enormous. Besides the obvious general advantage of working from a consensual understanding and definition of what a generic human is, we can eliminate the characterizations of the perennial conflicts as being between “progress and piety” or between creationism and evolution, or science and faith. The new paradigm finally and conclusively resolves the creation-evolutionary conflict specifically concerning our unique genesis. If the new paradigm is substantially correct then the box is illusory, the creationists are only half wrong and the evolutionists are only half right: there was a creation but it took place in a genetic laboratory; there is a human evolutionary process but it was interrupted by the Anunnaki inserting their genes into the Homo Erectus gene code, a very pragmatic, non-Darwinian kind of interference. We were created and we are evolving but both in unique ways. 

In short: the entire set of world views, theistic, theo -political, cultural, and scientific that purport to explain our genesis, history, and development as a species are about to be replaced as we recover finally from racial amnesia. The revolution is inevitable. It will take probably a century to fully accomplish socially because of the sweepingly profound nature of the resulting change, the natural resistance of the established institutions, and the need to reeducate and transition without disorientation.The new world view is gradually taking hold, cannot be ignored, and is waiting in the wings. It is only a matter of time. A unique and vital characteristic is that it addresses and explains and redefines the root source of all the ancient religions of the world on a common basis so that no particular religion can claim privileged status of any kind. Religion, as we know it, will be understood in the context of our Realevolution. 

There is no better example of the Galileo effect (we will not look through your telescope because we know what you say you see can’t be so) in the academic and scientific arenas than the reaction to the Sitchin paradigm. Campus, scientific, and theological imperialism and the fields of anthropology, archaeology, and astronomy, particularly, have tried all the usual unprofessional, unscholarly, shunning, chest thumping, fang baring, proprietary turf posturing and ad hominem attacks through teeth clenched in tenure tetanus, but the thesis becomes more and more robust as new evidence comes in continually from archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, genetics and other disciplines. If Darwin’s thesis was a blockbuster, Sitchin’s thesis is a hydrogen bomb. We may have been able to afford to dally with Darwin and defer to religion for as long as we have but the rapid changes in modern times will force us to consider Sitchin’s thesis seriously and intensely on a much shorter basis. 

Still dallying with Darwin 

Of course, most scientists and sophisticated scholars consider themselves enlightened in that they espouse some form of Darwinian evolutionary theory as the party line, although there are serious arguments even within the scientific arena as to the full validity of the Darwinian thesis. Generally, philosophers and scientists apologize if they think they are even possibly sounding like creationists, spend most of their energy in either promulgating some version of Darwinian evolution or attacking what they judge to be its too radical application, get entangled in arguments about whether Darwinian evolution can be invoked to explain human creativity, even aesthetics, and generally put down any other explanation out of hand. 

The general thesis, therefore, goes like this: the acceptance of evolution as the mechanism by which we came about causes us to understand that we are a collection of biological molecules, interacting with each other as in a mechanism, according to well-defined laws and rules derived from physics and chemistry – although not all known or understood by humans as yet. Defining consciousness within this biological model is still a pivotal problem: some say it is simply an epiphenomenon, an effect of the operation of all the parts of the brain working in consort, some say it is the subjective self-perception by the individual, some say it must be based in some “new stuff”, some new physics or chemistry that we don’t yet understand. 

Across the general population, however, we do not even agree on whether we are evolving, what the process really is if, indeed, we are evolving, from what source and how we began, and in what direction and on what trajectory, whatever that process is, we are headed. We do not agree, even more fundamentally, as to what criteria to use to judge these matters. We are not discussing the same entity. Creationists, obviously, do not think of humans as having evolved in the past or as evolving in the present. If we do not agree that we are evolving, can evolve, or whether any evolution of a species or individual must be by mindless Darwinian mechanisms, or whether there are effective methodologies for expediting conscious self-evolution, we will continue to be at standstill. It is quite ironical, however, that even most of those who hold for some evolutionary view of humankind evolving to human status in the past do not seem to think in terms of humans evolving in the present, much less having a well defined conceptualization of what that process might be. 

Charles Darwin published his arguments for evolution in 1859, one hundred and forty three years ago. Schliemann opened the buried Pandora’s box of our real archaeological history in 1873, one hundred and twenty four years ago. Sitchin, having gained the advantage of discoveries in archaeology, astronomy, space travel, genetics and linguistics as elucidating and explanatory tools, published first only in 1976, already over a quarter century ago. Using this rough chronology as a guide, we might anticipate, even with some exponential bit of acceleration, that the initial general recognition and acceptance of the Sitchin paradigm will not happen for, perhaps, some fifty years. We really can’t afford, however, to see Kuhn’s thesis [6] that scientific revolutions take place only by the old guard dying off rather than by an acceptance through careful study, critique and proving out, borne out once again. 

Bicameral genetics and our ‘realevolution’ 

In searching for a word to clearly distinguish between the various Darwinian type theories of evolution usually applied to all species including ours, and our unique evolution as revealed by our history, science and genetics I have found it convenient to invent the word “Realevolution” [7] .

Consider the facts of our unique genetics and differences from any other anthropoid or humanoid. Current investigation says our genetics are about 98 percent the same as a chimp’s. Regardless, that two, perhaps only one percent obviously makes a vast difference. We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion of the second and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery.

Even today, the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us; Homo Erectus is currently being promoted. We were contemporaneous with Neanderthals or even preceded them. We showed up too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record. We present with very many startling, obvious differences from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species, are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages; small flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone density; our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management are completely different.

Human females do not have an estrus cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to say the very least. It becomes quite obvious why we (as a product of a melding of two racial gene codes where quality control was conditioned by pragmatic purposes) have some four thousand genetic defects in light of the complexity of the merging. [8] Homo erectus, our half ancestor, took a million years to go from rough flaked stone tools to smooth ones.

You could hardly notice any change. We have come from stone tools to going to Mars in only some 200,000 years. If the Sitchin paradigm is correct, all these facts are explained easily. If we ignore this body of information as we read out and work with the human genome we handicap ourselves unnecessarily and deprive ourselves of valuable clues and understanding. Darwinian principles may generally apply to hominid species before us but they clearly do not apply to our unique synthetic genesis and subsequent development.

If the Anunnaki were interested only in engineering what clearly amounted to disposable units then it may reasonably be inferred that the completeness of the engineering would not have to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and defects we present. It has been argued, theoretically, that, although the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only a few typical genetic diseases, we show 4,000 because of the relative complexity of our organism. However, we are not that much more complex genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not hold. 

A Planetary Focus for the Genome Project and Genetic Research 

The Sitchin paradigm provides a comprehensive context in which to understand and explain the enigmatic facts and anthropological anomalies of the Darwinian model of our species existence, which we have already amassed. It provides the context and data for bringing the efforts of geneticists and the genome projects, often scattered for a variety of reasons, to a focus on correcting and perfecting the genetic code, eliminating all disease and handicaps, and providing us the option of immortality. Immortality is a pivotal topic in all considering and learning from all phases of the Anunnaki-human history. We know directly from the records of their decisions that the Anunnaki did not give us the relatively extreme longevity or immortality they possessed by conscious deliberate decision. It did not fit their purposes: we were developed as slave workers.

The records also show, however, that, over time, a handful of humans were granted immortality also by deliberate decision as a reward for being good subordinates in various roles usually as kings/foremen or for carrying out some critical mission. Another lesson: there may well be identifiable gene sequences that control the aging and dying process that are clearly and definitely manipulatable giving indication that we will be able to rectify their possible deliberate suppression. 

During the genetic investigations now in process, therefore, it would be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to be constantly inspecting the results of the decipherment for signs of the genetic merging, and to develop protocols to determine such, if needed, as well as following the clues mentioned herein. By doing so, interpretations and explanations may possibly be facilitated, progress accelerated and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved. The information gained would be, reciprocally, a major, pivotal, invaluable resultant spin-off contribution to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural generic history. Understanding our bicameral gene code in the context of the new paradigm will facilitate the elimination of the schizoid puzzles in our collective and individual psyches and the correction and perfecting of our genetics. 

Immortality, An emergent Wild Card 

We get born, no owner’s manual, to often dubiously qualified, puzzled and puzzling parents, subject to a multitude of diseases, struggle to make sense out of what the hell existence on this planet in this universe is all about and how to deal with it, wonder why there are so many conflicting philosophies and institutions claiming cosmic franchising and, often, why the universe seems so unfair and then we die. We are generally conditioned by theocultural traditions to accept these bizarre conditions as “normal”’ and the will of some god. If we rethink our situation in terms of our restored history, however, things make a great deal more sense although, for now, there may not be a planetary cure or relief for some of them.

If we recognize that we are the product of a genetically engineered melding of two quite different gene codes, literally a bicameral species, displaying a decidedly non-Darwinian kind of evolutionary development, just now beginning to step out of racial adolescence, only now beginning to grasp our racial psychology, possessing a gene code that, significantly and disconcertingly, manifests four thousand and counting potential genetic defects, struggling desperately with a short life span and certain mortality, we will know precisely who and what we are.  By enabling us to break the godspell we are freed to collectively work toward planetarily common goals in genetic science: the correction of the defects in our genetic code, the elimination of diseases in all of mankind, the providing of the option of immortality to all. 

In the greatest perspective, perhaps we should recognize from the outset that immortality will be both a new and awesome plateau of human existence offering as yet probably undreamed potential and yet, without denigrating that potential at all, ultimately just another “trip”, just another step in our meta-evolution, the rapid metamorphosis we have been undergoing since our beginning. Within those extremes there is the greatest latitude for the inevitable expansion into dimensions which will allow us to become far wiser, individually, through greater experience, greater learning, and the ability to witness the patterns of repetitions of extended periodicity. Eliminating the pressure of a short life span that influences our choices and cramps our lives will not just give us the practical potential to travel easily between star systems and send the insurance companies into the re-edit mode; it will change our perspective and our social interactions, certainly the entirety of human existence, radically. 

Beyond Religion and The Old New Age  

Over the last 2000 years we have seen scientific or pseudoscientific doctrines espoused by the various religions being contradicted or demolished and the religions, repeatedly ,although with great delay, change their positions with regard to our genesis, history, evolution and science, and modify their doctrines. But the new paradigm addresses the very root doctrines ,position s,claimed divine franchise and authority of all the religions of the world and will eventually cause the disappearance of all institutionalized religions springing from our ancient relationship of subservience to the Anunnaki. 

Religion, as we know it, is the transmutation of the Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery and then limited, subservient partnership, the godspell. The concept of God, capital G, has gradually developed through the cosmification of the various Anunnaki rulers Enlil (Jehovah/YHWH), Enki (Adonai, the Lord), Allah (El/Nannar/Sin), among others, gradually embellished with the heady concepts of metaphysical speculation. It has lately become a sort of faux ecumenical gloss: the TV news quotes the Koran as saying “There is no God but God” when it should be “There is no god but Allah”, a completely different meaning. The god of the Judeo-Roman Christian tradition, Jehovah-YHWH was – quite possibly still is – the flesh and blood Anunnaki individual, Enlil, eventually cosmified into the absolute creator of the universe, eventually spoken of as infinite love, infinite justice, infinite this or infinite that, through the bishops and the scholastic philosophers and theologians. 

The Concept of “God” 

The idea of a cosmic, infinite principle “God”, as many of us still take it for granted, is a thoroughly mixed composite concept of the sublimation of the anthropomorphic and imperfect Anunnaki individuals, the “deities” of slave code religions, metaphysical abstractions accumulated over time through the speculations of the revered philosophers from the Greeks onward, the Hellenic influenced, theo-philosophical teachings of the Roman Church scholastic tradition and mystics, flavored with the concepts of theists, deists, agnostics, theosophists and mystics of any number of sects, and thoroughly leavened by the concepts of the consciousness expanding disciplines and metaphysical doctrines of the East, sprinkled with our own individual intellectual and emotional subjective variations and usually still conditioned by the godspell element of subservience. But that cosmified composite intellectual abstraction is not the Jehovah/YHWH or Jesus of the Judeo-Christian religions, the Prime Mover of Thomas Aquinas or the Omega point of De Chardin, the Allah of the Muslim faith, the Brahma of Hinduism, the Buddha, or the Tao or deity of the religion of your choice. 

Many who do not realize this crucial distinction, do not want to, or are not ready to, take refuge in the Big-G-little-g syndrome, a sort of halfway shelter on the way to genetic enlightenment.  That position is articulated as, “I see the real historical nature of the “gods”, the little “g’s”, but that does not shake my belief in a Big G”. That way they can still subscribe to the platitudes that the “God of all religions” is beyond individual doctrinal differences and contradictory theologies, “all paths lead to the same God” and similar inane notions. The new paradigm affords us the opportunity to sort all these elements out, identify the different individual real gods of the various religions, place them and ourselves in historical perspective and recognize the metaphysical conceptualizations of “deity”, East and West, as a product of our own evolving racial psychology. 

Yes, the new paradigm means that religion and religions, as we know them, will have to bow out. The godspell phenomenon has two parts: we need to overcome the slave mentality of dependence and subservience and we need to discard the institutional religions which sprang from and dominated through it, especially the radical fundamentalism, West and East, that is ultimately tearing the race apart. The role of the theologian then becomes the facilitating of planetary reconciliation in the transition to the time beyond religion 

The institutional, slave-code, godspell religions, have fixed dogmas which are directly contradicted by the new paradigm.  They claim divine franchise by gods who are now radically redefined.  They claim absolute authority over the disciplines that produce the information that would demonstrate their true historical nature. The ultimate driving force will most probably be a degree of desperation and desire for peace gradually manifesting in the entire planetary population so strong that it will cause an abandonment of the authoritarian leaders and dogmas of the religions, followed by a younger generation of clerics who will recognize the inevitable and introduce new interpretations and relaxed rules to gradually smooth the phase out and transition, hopefully to humanitarian organizations and peace movements.  The signs of transition of some religious organizations to charitable and ecological focus may be seen as an almost inchoate beginning of this kind of transformation. It would also be foolish not to expect diehard fundamentalist backlash. 

Is this atheism? No, paradoxically, not as such. Not as we have defined atheism previously as the denial of the existence of any kind of god, cosmic or otherwise. It simply is a long overdue correction of some local, intra-solar system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective. Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of whatever sublimated local Anunnaki “god” is still the object of worship (the original meaning of worship was “work for”: AVOD = work). .

Neither is this materialistic reductionism although it does force us to reconsider the notion of the “spiritual”. What is needed is a complete overhaul of all our metaphors and concepts of the “spiritual” because the great majority of them are embedded in our cultural fabric and consciousness as leftovers from Judeo-Roman Catholic theology and second hand Eastern philosophies. The importance of this overhaul is critical because it involves the concepts of mind, intelligence, will, self-awareness, transcendence, dimensionality, self. 

Beyond The Babel Factor: Human Over-Unity 

The new paradigm is the basis, perhaps the only adequate basis, for a profound unification of all humanity. Not some superficial token ecumenicism or social homogenization of peoples and cultures and philosophies but a unification that frees us to be one race and explains and enhances our diversity of adaptations and cultures and contributions. The cumulative evidence and restored history has enabled us to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. All the political, economic, social, scientific, new age, evolutionary variables are only symptomatic; the genetic level is where the profound realization must blossom. The restoration of our generic history and a generic definition of what a human is afford us the advancement that will take the planet off hold. We can move beyond the Babel factor, slave-code religions, beyond the old new age. We can reach a planetary unity we have never known before. And a peace so profound it will be almost humorous. 

The Current Grand Moment 

This is the end game of an age, be certain. A new human and a new civilization beyond religion and the old new age are on the horizon. I submit that the most fundamental, profound, overarching, sociological transformation we are going through at this point in our history is the change from the theo-politically controlled and manipulated explanations of our beginnings and history to species independence. We are witnessing the last gasp of religious fundamentalism worldwide. Whether we chose to acknowledge it or not, we are already well into one of “…. those Grand Moments when the whole scale of being is reevaluated” as John Petersen has characterized it. It is within these redefinitions that the resolutions to the problems and obstacles deeply embedded in our species’ and individual psyches’ are to be found. To paraphrase Dylan Thomas rather crudely, let us not go blind into that daylight.

But how do we accomplish the transition from our current planetary standstill to planetary consensus gracefully and quickly? It’s best to recognize from the outset that the revolution required, the meta-wild card so radical in its implications and ramifications and requirements, that there is no single discipline, no institution, certainly no individual or group who can bring it about alone.  It is so planetarily encompassing that stepping outside of this box is almost impossible. The change will have to come from within. 

Science, the closest we can come to a common ground, a common criterion, has played and will continue to play a pivotal role in the recognition and acceptance of the new worldview. 

Astronomy will demonstrate the existence of the tenth planet unequivocally. The IRAS, Infrared Imaging Satellite, quite obviously discovered it in ‘83-’84 and, reluctantly, recognize the correspondence of the details gradually accumulated with the ancient data we now possess. The curiosity about the existence of the Anunnaki on Nibiru/Planet X will become overwhelming and contact through spacecraft and signaling will commence. 

Archaeology, for the last one hundred and fifty years, has been making the major contributions of data and will continue to do so.  Only recently, the science of genetics has been able to refine, sometimes correct, archaeological and anthropological estimates and dating. Because of the intertwining of the archaeological and genetic information concerning our unique genesis, genetics has already and should continue to be a major tool and contributing science to the new paradigm. 

The more robust the scientific information becomes the easier it will be for the religions of the world to accept and incorporate.  Nations and cultures as well will see the cogency of the information and gradually accept it, becoming gradually more planetary in outlook. 

In the name of world unity and peace, governments and contributing entities should increase funding of the scientific searches and research in these disciplines and adopt policies that will release the information, some of it quite certainly withheld at this time, already possessed. 

Gardner’s Contribution: Western Culture Revisited 

A major contribution to the resolution of the conflicts between the religions of Western culture in this regard is the work of Sir Laurence Gardner.  Sitchin’s work and the major discoveries of the Dead Sea Scrolls, has enabled Gardner, an English genealogist—historian to make a recent breakthrough. Gardner has the advantage of one hundred and fifty years of discovery and translation of the Sumerian source material, knowledge of Anunnaki politics and the interaction of Enki and Enlil implemented by the latest scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hamadi documents through the brilliant work of the Australian theologian, Barbara Thiering [9] . Working as a genealogist with data available through privileged access to the private archives of thirty European royal family clients, Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history of a special bloodline carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki and Sumeria.

This information, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer fearful of the boiling oil of the Inquisition, has always been available. He has identified the Holy Grail as this bloodline of humans, enhanced by Enki with additional Anunnaki genes, intended to be human leader-rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” traceable all the way back to Sumer [10]. The modern word Grail traces back to graal, san graal, which, etymologically, stems from the Sumerian root words GRA AL, meaning special bloodline. The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes, initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by the Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jesus was an Essene in the bloodline as was Mary Magdalene. They were man and wife and had children. Jesus was of a liberal persuasion within that tradition. 

This strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism eventually became known as heterodox Christian (the word Christian was not coined until almost four hundred years later) was opposed by the Pauline branch which eventually allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church. The orthodox Roman Church perpetuated the slave-code fear and subservience tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the human-centered strain of the bloodline. The reason why women have always been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on transmission through the women of the line and any recognition of them would be recognition of the line. This is a further elucidation of our genetic background. It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the genome due to the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” still reigning in archaeology. We are the product of that Nefilim technology, a mutant species with bicameral genetics, bicameral mind. The word from station DNA is these “gods” wear designer genes. 

Part 3 
The New Human 

We need to think about what it is like to be a member of a synthesized species which is going through a special case of evolution, a rapid metamorphosis, where we can actually determine our own evolutionary direction, when the ramifications of that unthinkable thought are now about to bring about a turning point in our history. It is about the new civilization we are about to create out of the new planetary vision. 

Let us postulate that we have broken the godspell, we have arrived at a consensual, planetary, understanding and definition of the generic human as a genetically engineered species now coming out of racial adolescence into species first maturity, the individual cognizant of the ability to control and direct the nature and trajectory of his and her own personal evolution and able and expected to contribute to the collective consciousness and determination of the racial evolutionary trajectory [11] .

The awareness and comprehension of this fundamental, generic, racial self-knowledge I have called genetic enlightenment. By “genetic enlightenment” I mean what it is like once you have broken the godspell, the effect of the ancient, subservient master-slave attitude that is the deepest dye in the fabrics of both Eastern and Western culture. Once we reach genetic enlightenment and break the godspell, many seemingly enigmatic items are resolved and there is a great deal to be done. It becomes immediately clear that we can move beyond both eastern and western metaphor;  beyond religion, atheism, the old new age; beyond Jungian archetypal and mythological interpretation ,beyond our strange, dangerous and contradictory mix of mammalian, turfish, violent politics and compassionate ideals. We will move, sooner than later, beyond death itself. 

The Trajectory of Realevolution 

When we, collectively, recognize the validity of the new paradigm and restore our true history to ourselves we will gain a critical major advantage in that we will be positioned to understand not only our unique synthetic nature but our unique evolutionary trajectory. Currently we disagree if we even are evolving or, if we are, how we are evolving or what the thrust and direction , the trajectory of that evolutionary dynamic might be. 

Once the locked-in, slave-code legacies are removed it becomes clear that the thrust, the direction, of our Realevolution is toward greater and greater expansion of freedom, compassion, understanding, cooperation, intelligence, consciousness ,dimensional perception, conscious personal and species orchestration and control. It raises and enhances the individual’s level of importance, the scope of the individual’s choices and enlarges the arena of exploration. It points towards immortality and beyond, to transforms of our nature hardly imaginable now. The message is that liberated human nature and existence is open-ended, forward creative, poetic, rhapsodic, expanding, exciting and enticing. 

The Demographics of Our Realevolution 

The evolutionary demographic profile of the species, at any given time, tends to be that of a bell curve. The segments of the bell curve are composed of gene pools with different focuses and different functions.  Perhaps two percent of the population, at any given time, will be located at the very leading edge of the curve. These are the futants, those who are genetically programmed to be the evolutionary scouts of future dimensions, scenarios, and potentials. Rather than kill them, jail them, shun them, we had better learn to recognize their function, sort out the valuable parts of their reports of the future, and honor their contribution to the evolutionary progress of our species. 

IQ meets CQ… and EQ? 

Genetic enlightenment will afford derivative major advantages in psychology, sociology, and education. Once recognizing the nature and direction of our realevolution we will be positioned to understand the details of its mechanism.  The current agenda of the DNA intelligence is to produce neurological systems that can use themselves as an instrument and bodies sophisticated enough to house them. There are a number of survival functions necessary to protect, preserve, and further that goal and the species. These functions are accomplished by specific gene pools of individuals.  Individual, personal realevolution recapitulates the realevolution of the species and this involves the individual moving through different gene pools at different ages and stages. Education is most effectively accomplished in gene pool contexts at the time the child, adolescent or adult is evolving through or specializing in a particular gene pool. 

IQ, intelligent quotient is defined in realevolutionary terms as an estimate of the degree of proficiency of an entity to receive, process, transmit information from external and internal sources, testable and measurable against a relative peer scale. 

Just as one can test to determine if an entity possesses some degree of intelligence so one can test to determine if an entity has some degree of consciousness. Just as with intelligence, once determined in an entity, one can devise relative criteria and scales to measure the extent of the spectrum of awarenesses and the degree and focus of each kind of awareness, its integration and the degree of conscious use by the entity of its input and data. Let us call this the consciousness quotient: CQ. 

How primitive are we still? Tests for a consciousness quotient, CQ, do not seem to be a concept with which our collective consciousness is comfortable just yet. Not just a test to determine a verifiable state of awareness. Not just a test to see if we can be Turinged by some program or entity. A test of consciousness quotient would determine the entire range of awarenesses of the entity, human or otherwise, and the degree of development and intensity, quality and focus of each part of that spectrum. 

The democratic ideal is twisted with regard to consciousness as it is with IQ. Yes, all humans are created equal as far as their human rights are concerned but we all don’t have the same abilities or degrees of capabilities or intelligence or consciousness. Somehow, such a recognition is seen by some to be less than politically correct, or a denigration of some individuals. 

How primitive are we? If the notion of a CQ is touchy, try EQ, an individual’s evolutionary quotient, and a relative scale measure of an individual’s evolutionary development and potential. We continually make ad hoc judgments, many times for the sake of our own security and safety, about the relatively evolved or devolved physical, mental and consciousness characteristics and signals of others just as we are doing continually about their manifest IQ. A parent or teacher or psychologist expects a statement like “This person has a higher IQ than that person” to be sophisticated and socially acceptable. If, however, one dares broach the notion of a consciousness quotient, CQ, communicatory flags go up; there is disconcertion, confusion, and even conflict.  Advance the concept of an EQ, an evolutionary developmental quotient, and things get really squirrelly. Once we are adjusted to the concept of the individual, from conception on, recapitulating the stages of species evolution, we will begin to take the notions of CQ and EQ as given.  We will need them to recognize the developmental stage of a child or adult in order to determine in which gene pool context he or she should be educated in or contribute to at that point, thereby most effectively promoting and accelerating her or his personal realevolution. 

The recognition that the stages of realevolution are stages of conscious evolution will facilitate the resolution of the perennial academic problem involving other than “normal” states of consciousness. At this primitive stage, we cannot even agree on what constitutes the real or “legitimate” elements of the spectrum of human consciousness. If an investigator’s paradigm or consciousness does not happen to have the capacity for some perception, sensitivity or ability, its reality is often denied, a priori, in other humans. It may not even be admitted for testing or the investigation turned into an inquisition using magicians as the inquisitors instead of Dominican monks in the public square of some “learning” channel.

We argue about the reality of various kinds of extrasensory perception, non-local communication, transcendental states, and perceivable dimensionalities and never seem to be able to come to definitive conclusions unless, of course, the Pentagon needs remote viewers. Consciousness in, consciousness out. Once we have understood realevolution as essentially a process of consciousness development, the paranormal modalities will be recognized as advanced, evolved functions along the realevolutionary trajectory.  Timothy Leary, Ph.D., the Tesla of psychology, developed an elegant schema to identify the types of consciousness at each stage of realevolution, past, present and coming. I have included a summary of it as Appendix B. It is a road and flight map of realevolution.  Note well the simple but profound advice: “The answer to all human problems is to recognize your genetic stage, go to the place where your genetic peers hang out, and in that secure place prepare yourself for the future stages inevitably awaiting you.” 

We need institutions and governments that are built intrinsically on and for those characteristics, to support and further the evolution of the species and the individual as a primary function.  The structure of constitutions and laws should promote the greatest degree of freedom of expansion and exploration by the individual and the species. 

Well, you say, here in the U. S., the Constitution is an advanced and enlightened document, which has solved many of those problems, at least in this country. I submit that the Constitution, certainly advanced and relatively enlightened when it was conceived and put in place, was an ingenious solution, created by deists, for maintaining some semblance of peace between the Colonial religious factions, restraining the religious mayhem always under the surface. However, there is no indication of any anticipation that there would ever be a resolution of those differences, no anticipation of a common definition and understanding of human nature. The Constitution, as unique and effective as it is as a set of rules of order in a primitive situation, has become a locked-in legacy. It barely continues to balance the powers, long term, and prevent the takeover of the government and imposition of theocracy by one religion or another. 

The extraordinary element remaining is the seed of evolutionary suggestion clearly intended by its authors as expressed by Jefferson when he said:

“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change. With the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.” 

A planetarily consensual conception of the generically human will enable us to derive improved forms of constitutions and develop systems of representation of individual input and voting far more adequate and accurate than our current systems of representation by strangers. That would be a first step. They will render outmoded our current systems that are modeled, to one degree or another on the residue of slave-code religious rules. They will be determined democratically by direct input from the entire population and constructed to further and abet the evolution of the individual and the species. We, in the U.S., are in need of a second Constitution.

If America ,or any country or culture or religion is going to be an example for the rest of the world, there is no other choice but for it to set a Realevolutionary example and style. It will require thinkers and scholars and innovators and futants from every discipline in every culture and country and religion to assimilate the vast amount of history, information, ooparts, traditions and technology which have been rediscovered and recovered over the last one hundred and fifty years from all parts of the world and to transform their religions and cultures accordingly.  In the case of religion and theology, it will mean the transformation of slave-code, cargo-cult paradigms to humanistic, evolutionarily exploratory ones. To remain static in antiquated belief systems is to try to resist the currents of our realevolution.  To remain subject to ancient Anunnaki slave-codes is to remain in slavery to long absent slave-masters. 

We can finally integrate both halves of our nature. Our Homo Erectus component will bring us back to harmony with this planet, making it a nice place to live and a nice place to visit. Our Anunnaki component will teach us how to move off planet gracefully. 

Consciousness In, Consciousness Out 

The new paradigm, elucidating our unique genesis and subsequent unique evolution (at least on this planet: it may happen similarly with synthesized species elsewhere) as, in a very real sense, an artificial intelligence, frees us to conceive the real questions we need to ask ourselves and the answers not only our science but the entire racial pool of experience and knowledge needs to provide with regard to AI. One of the most important contributions our restored history provides relates directly to the novel wild card concept of self-aware artificial consciousness in that it furnishes a wealth of information on the sociobiology of the creation of a synthetic species and the resulting, evolving social relationship between the creators and the created, between the Anunnaki and us. 

Specifically, concerning the question as to whether Artificial Intelligence [12] can actually be achieved and how we should go about it, our history is a strong source of a positive answer. The Anunnaki, even while here, according to the recovered records of their deeds and interactions, besides genetically inventing humans, quite clearly had developed robots and androids, some of the latter being so sophisticated that, it is written, it was difficult to tell one from a human or an Anunnaki. We can profit from the Anunnaki’s experience in both creating a new species and in their development and use of robots and sophisticated androids [13] as well as the awesome invention of a species such as we. 

The realization of our half-alien genetic makeup and our relationship to the Anunnaki stretches our perspective to afford an effective way for us to begin to grasp the topic of alien presence on this planet. It also enables a, previously unattainable, unassailable integrity individually and as a race which will be essential to entering into direct contact with alien species, either in the future or with ones that are already here on the planet. We shall finally enter stellar society as a mature race which knows who and what it is, what is good for it and what is not; with whom or what it could interact, with whom and what it would be dangerous to make contact; with the minimum of preconceptions as to how things should be. Until we know who and what we are we will probably not be allowed into stellar society. Until we break the godspell and stop looking up for Daddy to come back, looking for some solution or salvation from outside, we will be in danger of getting Borged by whomever shows up here. The topic of alien contact is probably the most dramatic of examples of how narrow and primitive our focus is. It is a fact and the gradual insinuation of it into our collective consciousness has progressed in the last fifty years. 

A Retrospective View From 2100 

The elements that characterize the new civilization are a collective, consensual awareness of our generic humanity as a planetary unity, a recognition of a common, known history from the beginning of the race as a genetically engineered species, a globally common conception of human nature and its evolutionary direction, a multi–dimensional sociobiology capable of reflexive self-analysis, a psychology devoted to fostering the positive evolutionary development of the individual over the entire spectrum of consciousness, a unified scientific field expressed through a profound natural language based on self-referential consciousness, an ecological, non-competitive, ubiquitously helpful economics, an integral systems approach to the management of the material realm, with the primary focus on the transcendental as the essential human process. 

With the demise of godspell religions and the dawning of a generic, planetary, definition of human nature the social context and educational process will undergo a profound revolution. The orientation will not be  to a creationist or a Darwinian evolutionary context but to a generic, planetarily common realevolutionary context. We will be finally free to understand our common species predecessors and our bicameral species heritage in perspective.  That perspective will afford us the detailed information concerning the stages of developmental realevolution we have passed through to this point.  We will be able to understand and utilize the realevolutionary map of those stages as laid out by Leary in the first-of-its-kind schema in Appendix B. 

The awareness of the historical stages and trajectory of  realevolution will make us conscious of the agenda of DNA, of our genetic coding:  survival and ever increasing conscious control over our own existence. We might say that we are totally determined to determine our own determination. Gene pools (groups throughout the population that are predominantly programmed for certain functions for survival of the species) will be recognized for what they are and valued.  Once conscious of the nature and purpose of  these specialized populations and how they map on to the stages of realevolution we will see that we may move from gene pool to gene pool, adsorbing the ancient wisdom of each for survival and personal learning and expansion. Moving from gene pool to gene pool will be a natural process of an individual’s unique personal realevolutionary process. There will be a mutual respect and positive recognition between gene pools beyond just tolerance, and the only rule necessary will be a consensually agreed prohibition of any gene pool doing anything that will harm or obstruct the function of another gene pool. The gene pool golden rule. This brings us full circle to the succinct advice given by Leary: recognize your genetic stage, go to the place where your genetic peers hang out, and in that secure place prepare yourself for the future stages inevitably awaiting you. 

It also brings us full circle around to the children, us in the future. I project a realevolutionary scenario for the treatment and education of the children of the 21 st century to develop as follows. 

A further refinement of the gene pool concept will be its incorporation into the educational process: the stages of the recapitulatory developmental process of the human child will be mapped onto the various gene pools but without assigning hierarchical ranking to them. A child will have the opportunity to experience the best features of the various phases of human evolutionary experimentation. The quintessence of the hunter, the gatherer, the agriculturist cultures presented by those steeped and expert in the context will put the student in tune with deep genetic roots, survival methods, cooperation and creativity. The crafts, industrial, mechanical, engineering, construction, building gene pools; the arts, literary, musical pools; the military, police, and civil servant gene pools all have some essence of their orientation to reality to offer as insight into a facet of human nature and ingenuity. The domestic, child-bearing and rearing, cooperative, social, political, educational, pools will certainly all contribute to the recapitulatory phases of a child’s development, each at its proper time. 

The children will be encouraged to be their own philosophers from the earliest age according to their capacity at any age and stage. They will be encouraged to make their own decisions about reality and to explore and follow their own unique evolutionary development and to respectfully make their unique contribution to the ongoing conversation about the ideal trajectory of our racial evolution. Language, reason, logic will be understood to be a product of certain stages of our realevolutionary perception of three dimensional reality. They will be taught the nature of reality in the most expanded scientific and philosophical context we know, and introduced to the concept of action which enhances others while it enhances us. They will be enabled to continue the process of personal realevolution on their own.  In peace. 

What to do after genetic enlightenment has \broken the godspell, the looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy-to-return, master-slave attitude, the, deepest dye in the fabrics of all cultures? In the immediate future, the god games we shall play as our own evolutionary artists are immortality [14] ; self-directed, conscious evolution; four-dimensional consciousness; life under a law of everything; practical transcendence; the development of AI as a subordinate species and for use in surrogate operations. For starters. Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim, withheld from humans, will be transformed, from “religious” afterlife reward to the dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our racial maturation. We will be our own “gods”, our own genetic credentials, play our own god-games with an unassailable species identity enabling us to step confidently into stellar society. 

But what of us individually? Once the ancient, subservient godspell is dispelled we are freed, individually, to go one on one with the universe. We will operate as our own “gods”, according to our own genetic credentials, play our own god-games according to our own transcendental choices, creating our own confident realities. We will perfect systematic self-supercedure as a means of conscious evolution to an art form. 

The characteristics that mark the new human are an unassailable personal integrity, relativistic epistemology, profound compassion, robust depth of informational data, understanding of the universe in terms of a full unified field, broad-spectrum competence, transcendental competition, facility in dimensional shifting, preference for dyadic operation, a profound ability to enjoy, to play the games most enjoyable and satisfying to generic “gods”, an expanded capacity to literally have great fun creating new realities, with the primary focus on the multi-dimensional. And to play those “god” games in the context of relative immortality and, eventually, habitual four-dimensional consciousness. 

We have at hand the cumulative data and information to initiate the planetary unification process. Let us make it so for the children.

What evidence supports the Sitchin thesis? 

The Astronomical Evidence 

“…no concrete problem is going to be solved as long as the experts of astronomy are too supercilious to touch “mythical” ideas — which are firmly believed to be plain nonsense, of course — as long as historians of religion swear to it that stars and planets were smuggled into originally “healthy” fertility cults and naive fairy tales only “very late” — whence these unhealthy subjects should be neglected by principle — and as long as the philologists imagine that familiarity with grammar replaces that scientific knowledge which they lack, and dislike.” – Giorgio de Santillana, Ph.D. & Hertha von Dechend, Ph.D. Hamlet’s Mill 

A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence, now or in the past, of the tenth planet in our solar system, the home planet of the Anunnaki with the size, orbit, and characteristics described, as Sitchin has demonstrated, in the Enuma Elish and corroborated by Harrington, former chief of the U.S. Naval Observatory, now deceased. 

Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto’s moon, in 1978. The characteristics of Pluto derivable from the nature of Charon demonstrated that there must still be a large planet undiscovered because Pluto could not be the cause of the residuals, the “wobbles” in the orbital paths of Uranus and Neptune clearly identifiable. The IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during ’83 -’84, produced observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the astronomers on the project said that “all that remains is to name it” — from which point the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992 Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with all the information they had at hand, published their findings and opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an “intruder” planet. The search was narrowed to the southern skies, below the ecliptic. Harrington invited Sitchin, having read his book and translations of the Enuma Elish, to a meeting at his office and they correlated the current findings with the ancient records. 

The recovered Enuma Elish document, a history of the formation of our solar system and more, says that, at the time when Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus and Saturn were in place, there was a Uranus sized planet, called Tiamat, in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A large wandering planet, called Nibiru, was captured into the system gravitationally. As it passed by the outer planets it caused the anomalies of their moons, the tilting of Uranus on its side, the dislodging of Pluto from its being a moon of Saturn to its own planetary orbit.

Its path bent by the gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites collided with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit through, Nibiru collided with Tiamat, driving the larger part of it into what is now Earth’s orbit to recongeal as Earth, dragging its moon with it to become our Moon with all its anomalies. The shattered debris of Tiamat’s smaller part became the asteroid belt, comets, and meteorites.

The gouge of our Pacific basin is awesome testimony to the collisional event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year elliptical retrograde (opposite direction to all the other planets) orbit around our sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region between Mars and Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past Pluto at apogee. Harrington acknowledged that his information agreed with all these details and the maps they each had drawn of the orbits were almost indistinguishable. The current probable location of Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was the same. 

It is the opinion of this author and others that, in light of the evidence already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10 and 11 and two Voyager space craft, the Infrared Imaging Satellite (IRAS, ‘83-84) and the clear and unequivocal statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin, that the search has already been accomplished, in fact that the planet has already been found. 

We need to force the issue of the tenth planet being in our solar system, not just to demonstrate the validity of the new paradigm but for a very practical reason. The ancient records are very clear. The passage of the tenth planet, Nibiru, once every 3600 years, through the inner solar system effects the Earth, sometimes in catastrophic ways. It is very probably the cause of pole shifts, pole reversals, changes in the precessional movement, perhaps even catastrophic bombardment by asteroid size space debris that it may drag along with it. Since it passes through the asteroid belt area between Mars and Jupiter and its orbital path may vary depending on the position of the other planets when it comes though, it may have been responsible for the devastation of Mars. A rigorous, detailed computer modeling of the solar system, including the tenth planet needs to be done urgently for our own planetary safety. Remember that the Vatican maintains an astronomical observatory and Msgr. Balducci may have access to information that prompts him to make the amazing statements he has —- no doubt as voice of the Vatican. 

The Technological Evidence 

Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of place in time artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions and documents which have come to light through archaeological excavation or discovery. Almost everyone is familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of stone requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000 ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc.

The most recent and quite amazing oopart is the rediscovery of monoatomic gold by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated by the advanced physics community) [See Superconductivity and Modern Alchemy in sidebar] Hudson’s discovery, correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the monoatomics were already known at least 3,000 years ago. These ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the historical records indicate that an advanced civilization existed in those times possessing a high technology and that that civilization was indeed the Anunnaki.

The Documentary Evidence 

The recorded historical documentation for the existence and deeds of the Anunnaki has become gradually available to us only since the early 1800’s. The excavation of the ancient sites of Mesopotamia brought to light the amazingly advanced civilization of Sumer and, with it, thousands of clay tablets containing not only mundane records of commerce, marriages, military actions and advanced astronomical calculation systems but of the history of the Anunnaki themselves. It is clear from those records that the Sumerians knew these aliens to be real flesh and blood. The library of the ruler, Ashurbanipal, at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down and the clay tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our reading. One of the most impressive finds, in very recent time, has been a sealed, nine foot by six foot room in Sippar holding, neatly arranged on shelves, a set of some 400 elaborate clay tablets containing an unbroken record of the history of those ancient times, a sort of time capsule. The evidence is so overwhelming and robust that, if it weren’t for those with power enough to suppress, it would have been accepted and our world view changed a century ago or, perhaps, sooner. 

The Genetic Evidence 

The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in east central Africa just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo Sapiens and in the same period. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000-year-old gold mines in that area.) The evidence for, and description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not correspond to the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary development of other species such as Homo Erectus before us. As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as discussed in part three. 

Scientific Objections to the Thesis 

How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in earth gravity and atmosphere, very similar to current humans in all ways, have evolved on a planet within our solar system whose orbital apogee takes it into the deep cold of space for much of its orbit? 

The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a “radiant” planet. This may be understood as having a high core temperature. Although controversial, there is also astrophysical opinion that a large body in elongated orbit is constantly tending toward circular orbit and this causes stresses in the body that could generate a good deal of heat. That their planet is gradually cooling, may be indicated by Sitchin’s interpretation of their colonizing Earth (contains most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) for the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold for molecular seeding of their atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding. Pertinent here is Harrington’s confident statement to Sitchin that it is “a nice, good planet, could be surrounded by gases, probably has an atmosphere and could support life like ours”. The sunlight level there might be quite different than on earth. The Anunnaki were often depicted or sculpted with what seem to be obviously sunglasses. 

If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different planet from earth under quite different conditions to which to adapt, why should they have turned out to be so identical to human species? Sitchin’s answer is based on the collisional event between the intruder planet, Nibiru, and the planet Tiamat, the residual part of which recongealed into the Earth after being driven into current Earth orbit. That the two, or at least one, of the colliding planets was sufficiently developed to have evolved basic organic compounds, perhaps even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from amino acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive organisms, could account for the evolutionary similarity.

Although this author finds it a reasonable hypothesis, even trivial, that advanced civilizations would be capable of crossing extremely different genomes, perhaps with even radically different bases, the cross-seeding theory can account for the apparent relative ease with which the Anunnaki impinged their genes on the genes of Homo Erectus. The Anunnaki skill level, 200,000 years ago, is indicated well by the recorded fact that, in early trials, they succeeded in crossing animal genes with Homo Erectus genes, obtained living hybrids which was never a satisfactory product but which led them to modify Homo Erectus genes with their advanced genes. 

If our genome is estimated as 98% to 99% similar to the chimpanzee, how could there be a melding of the Homo Erectus and Anunnaki genomes, or impingement of the advanced code on the lesser advanced one detectable? The author suggests that this is a major question probably answerable only by the geneticists open-minded enough to attack it. The resolution of that question should provide rich additional clues in itself.


The Author 

NEIL FREER is a researcher, lecturer, generalist and poet living in Santa Fe, NM. Neil and his wife, Ursula, have lived in the Eldorado area since 1994.  Neil holds a BA in English and did his graduate work in Philosophy and Psychology at the New School for Social Research. He has taught college courses in Philosophy and History of Religion, gives private and public seminars and lectures and has done over one hundred sixty radio and TV interviews. Neil is the author of Breaking the Godspell, which explores the archaeological, astronomical and genetic proof for our being a genetically engineered species and presents the ramifications of this new paradigm of human nature that resolves the Creationist-Evolutionary conflict. In his second book, God Games: What Do You Do Forever? he explores the ways in which we will live when, individually and collectively, we attain the unassailable integrity afforded by the restoration of our true genetic history. He outlines the racial maturity of the new planetary civilization and describes the new human. He is also an instrument rated private pilot. He has also opted to be immortal. He is signed up for cryogenic suspension to cover his bet in the event that the biotechnologists haven’t given us immortality before he dies. 

Email:  neil@neilfreer.com    Website: http://www.neilfreer.com 

Suggested Reading List:
Neil Freer Breaking the Godspell, God Games: What Do You Do Forever? 

Zecharia Sitchin Genesis Revisited , The Earth Chronicle Series, (7 books) 

Sir Laurence Gardner  Bloodline of the Holy Grail, Genesis of the Grail Kings 

Cremo & Thompson Forbidden Archaeology 


[1] Zecharia Sitchin, The Earth Chronicle Series ,Genesis Revisited 

[2] See video tape documentary, We Are Not Alone, for segment on meeting between Sitchin and Harrington, deceased head of the Naval Observatory at which they corroborate the evidence from astronomy, the Pioneer and Voyager space craft, the IRAS with the information from the ancient records. 

[3] Ooparts:  ostensibly out of  place in time, advanced technological devices, tools, toys, artifacts 

[4] To this point, since the Anunnaki phased off the planet, the last three thousand years of our history may be characterized as a prolonged polity fight over who holds proprietary authority over some absolute version of reality, who represents and interprets the will of some “god”. We fight each other over claims as to what human nature really is and by what rules it should operate. So, down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate tradition of what some particular “god” intended, what rules to follow, what we should be doing to demonstrate we are still loyal and docile servants. My God is better than your God. Sometimes we just kill each other over it. And persecutions, Crusades, Jihads, Inquisitions, evil empires, the saved and the damned, the martyr, the infidel, the saint, the protestant, the fundamentalist, the atheist, became — and remain. Not to mention the destruction of the great library of Alexandria and the madness of the World Trade Center. The old ecumenical platitude that we just have to discover the hidden esoteric level and we will see that all religions are just many different paths to the truth is sheer nonsense. 

Even in the year 2000, The New York Times still found it fit to print that the Roman Church has just reiterated officially that the Pope is still the only one with a direct red phone line to Yahweh while, at the same time, the Pope’s friend, Msgr. Corrado Balducci, unofficially, but neither unfrocked nor poisoned, goes about publicly acknowledging that Sitchin is right and the Anunnaki are coming back soon and Catholics are to be gotten ready for that event. And, oh yes, the Pope wants to make a pilgrimage to Ur… A pilgrimage to the first Anunnaki installation in Mesopotamia, southern modern Iraq. It is no coincidence that, at the same time we see signs that the governments are going to acknowledge the alien presence, the Roman Church is, in plain street language, shuckin’ and jivin’ to do the same, any way it can to maintain face and power as gracefully as it can. Let us understand the Roman Church as a political power rather than a pious institution, an extension of the Roman Empire, which it assimilated. The Brookings Institute study, commissioned by the government in the distant fifties, believed that the alien presence should not be revealed because it would totally unhinge the fundamentalist religions. So it is logical that the Church is active at the front of the trend to prevent that occurring. The other religions will have to follow to compete. And governments will be relieved. 

[5] In the Jungian psychoanalytic system, archetypes are fundamental ideational patterns and images that seem to have a kind of natural independent existence of their own in the “collective unconscious” of the human species regardless of cultural context. The mythic interpretation of the “gods”, the Anunnaki, has been promulgated by religions because to recognize the Anunnaki as real would be to open the door to a radical reinterpretation of the entire phenomenon of religion and put into question the real identity of the very deities at center of multiple belief systems. This mythological premise caused Joseph Campbell to say that something happened “in that little Sumerian mud garden” and spread all over the world and yet had to explain it all in terms of Jungian archetypes. Julian Jaynes (The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind: Boston MA Houghton Mifflin, 1982 p.405) said that, since all men previous to 1250 B.C. said they could see the gods, speak with them, get blueprints for new palaces they wanted built, etc. all men, previous to that time must have been hallucinating schizophrenics. 

[6] Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions  2nd ed. (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962) 

[7] I have worked loosely against the meaning of Realpolitik (politics based on practical and material factors rather than theoretical or ethical objectives) to express the literal sense of our real evolution based on a restored practical history and material archaeological artifacts, rather than on theory and/or religious objectives. 

[8] Lloyd Pye, Everything You Know is Wrong: Book 1: Human Evolution (Adamu Press, 1997) 

[9] Thiering, Barbara, Jesus the Man  Transworld Publishers: (London UK, 1993) 

[10] The critical concepts to take from this very brief synopsis of Gardner’s research is that the bloodline was instituted by Enki in Sumeria, progressed through Egypt, moved through the Hebrew Essene ethos, that Jesus was Essene and in the bloodline. The Bloodline tradition progressed from Sumer to Egypt and eventually to Israel. Bloodline kings came into their own based on natural succession. It moved through a long line of rulers, through David and the messiehs (anointed ones). The chief “textbook” for all the people was the document, Enuma Elish, which is a summary of the information about the formation of our solar system, when and where to look for their home planet, (Planet X / Nibiru) when it returned to the inner solar system periodically, the creation of humans by genetic engineering, etc. It was pivotally important and mandated to be recited with ceremony at each new year. It was recognized but treated ambiguously by the larger faction of the Hebrews who paid allegiance to Enlil. The Essenes were custodians of the tradition and their unusual marriage practices were all about the nurturing and timing of the births of bloodline children. Jesus and Mary Magdalene were Essenes of the bloodline and married in that tradition, had children. Jesus was of a more liberal faction and was in competition with his brother for messianic leadership. He was gotten down from the cross drugged comatose but alive and escaped. His appearance to his followers afterward was not a miracle, a hologram or an apparition, he was alive. Mary Magdalene took the children into southern France and eventually died at Aix-en-Provence in 63 A.D. 

[11] Yes, reincarnation is thrown into a different perspective. Yes, it could be a fact and may be even scientifically demonstrable in the near future. But, as our own evolutionary agents, free of both Western and Eastern karmadharmadiddle, we will realize that we have the right and the freedom to choose to stay around as long as we wish to see how reincarnation is proven out as an option also. 

[12] See my white paper, Towards A Prime Directive For Artificial Consciousness: “Zen” IN The Art Of Spiritual Machine Maintenance.  To be published on my website http://www.neilfreer.com for downloading. 

[13] Zecharia Sitchin, Divine Encounters (New York, Avon Books, 1996) 

[14] Immortality: it’s only a matter of simple human dignity. Currently, we get here somewhat bewildered, without an owner’s manual, have to struggle to make a living which prevents us from focusing on finding answers of our own to the fundamental questions with Death the Great Conditioner, subliminally dictating choices, prompting us to grasp at quick satisfactions in a brief lifetime, and then we die. The ancient records of why, when, and how we were genetically engineered make it abundantly clear that we were brought into existence as a subordinate species, a slave species to relieve the Anunnaki miner echelons. It is specified pointedly that, although the Anunnaki lived, literally, extended lifetimes of thousands of our years (either because of the way they themselves had evolved on their home planet or, perhaps, because of their genetic engineering capabilities to achieve that longevity, and clearly through their use of the monoatomic form of gold) they deliberately did not bestow that potential on us. In fact, it is mentioned clearly that they deliberately withheld it. From the details given in the ancient records, it is conceivable that some engineering of the process was executed deliberately to suppress certain characteristics to make better and docile slaves. This deliberate withholding of immortality and, perhaps, even a shortening of longevity, by the Anunnaki may provide a major clue to our aging process and mortality. Short shelf life and disposable product was fine for them. Sociologically, this is the reason why immortality, in one form or another, has become the sublimated reward for a good life in all the religions. We will read out the genome, find the aging sequence and control it.

Written by aurick

18/03/2009 at 11:56 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: